Zakład Prawa Konstytucyjnego i Badań Europejskich zaprasza na otwarte seminarium

Zakład Prawa Konstytucyjnego i Badań Europejskich zaprasza na otwarte seminarium, podczas którego prof. Scott Veitch wygłosi wykład pt Complicites, na temat współuczestnictwa w rozumieniu prawa konstytucyjnego i międzynarodowego. 
Zapraszamy na wykład i dyskusję. 

Spotkanie odbędzie się 9 czerwca o godz. 14.00 w sali 273.

Istnieje możliwość udziału zdalnego – link do spotkania:  https://teams.microsoft.com/meet/381336993040681?p=vCActtbzh3LDFJjtA2

Complicities
This paper analyses a puzzling phenomenon: if, sociologically, the complicity of a range of actors is the necessary condition for the occurrence of large scale wrongs and harms, why is its finding legally so exceptional? To address this, the paper will consider competing accounts of complicity, the value the concept has, and how and why it is deployed. It will draw on examples from large scale harms and wrongs, including genocide, climate change, and the potentially widespread damages from the increasing use of Artificial Intelligence. It concludes by offering an original understanding of the asymmetry between complicity’s everyday ubiquity and its legal exceptionality.

Prof. Scott Veitch
Professor
PAUL K C CHUNG PROFESSOR IN JURISPRUDENCE, HONG KONG UNIVERSITY
LLB PhD (Edin)

Professor Veitch writes and teaches in the areas of legal, social and political theory. Educated in Scotland he has worked at universities in Australia and the United Kingdom, and was formerly Professor of Jurisprudence at the University of Glasgow. He has held visiting academic positions in South Africa, New Zealand, Belgium, France and the Basque country.
Professor Veitch’s area of research is jurisprudence broadly defined, and his work draws on historical, philosophical and sociological insights into law and legal institutions. More specifically it has dealt with the politics of domestic and international law; critical aspects of legal reasoning; the role of law in processes of transition and its bearing on reconciliation and memory; and the relations between legal concepts and political economy.